Skip to main content
This forum is closed to new posts and responses. Individual names altered for privacy purposes. The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a forum for customer support requests. Any customer support requests should be directed to the official HCL customer support channels below:

HCL Software Customer Support Portal for U.S. Federal Government clients
HCL Software Customer Support Portal

Notes/Domino 6 and 7 Forum

Notes/Domino 6 and 7 Forum


  

PreviousPrevious NextNext

re: Not if you look at what he has to work with.
~Umberto Nongeroson 2.May.03 01:31 PM a Web browser
Domino Server All Releases Linux - RedHat


Hmmm.... you're right... I was thinking he had 7 potential drives for data alone. I guess that's what I get for starting a reply and coming back to it 4 hours later after working on some other stuff.

I'm re-reading his post, and he also says he will use one for a transaction log and one for view building (a very smart move, BTW). If you figure one more for OS/Executables/Swap/etc. then that's only 4 drives for data... 64 GB under RAID 1+0, 96GB under RAID 5.

It might definitely be a tight fit on RAID 1+0, but then again 64 GB might do him fine. Rainer, do you *also* need to keep one of those drives around as a spare?. In that case, a 3-disk RAID 5 configuration is your only option, which gives you 64GB for your data:

1 drive - OS/Executabes/swap
1 drive - Transaction log
1 drive - View building
1 drive - Spare
3 drives - data RAID 5, total of (2*32)=64GB storage

If 64GB isn't enough, another option might be moving the view building drive to your OS/Exec/Swap drive.

1 drive - OS/Executables/Swap/View building
1 drive - Transaction log
1 drive - Spare
4 drives - OS/Executables and data RAID 5, total of (3*32) = 96GB storage

This theoretically gives up a tiny bit of performance on the view-building, but if all that's running is Domino you shouldn't see much in the way of other I/O on that drive anyway if you've got sufficient RAM to keep swapping to a minimum. If that *is* the case and 64GB will work for your data, then using that configuration set up as RAID 1+0 would probably be your best route. With large DBs you'll want as data I/O as fast as you can. That would leave you with:

1 drive - OS/Executables/Swap/View building
1 drive - Transaction log
1 drive - Spare
4 drives - OS/Executables and data RAID 1+0, total of (2*32) = 64GB storage

Again, this only works if (a) you one of those 7 drives as a spare, (b) 64GB is enough for what your data, and (c) you've got enough RAM to keep swapping down (at least 2GB).




Performance/Raid question large dat... (~Holly Ektumist... 1.May.03)
. . RE: Performance/Raid question large... (~August Nimkrov... 1.May.03)
. . article of interest (~Ted Fezgerothe... 1.May.03)
. . RE: Performance/Raid question large... (~Delores Prenip... 1.May.03)
. . . . RE: Performance/Raid question large... (~Pippy Nimniobu... 4.May.03)
. . . . . . I think you're mistaken... re:Perfo... (~Sanjay Quettum... 8.May.03)
. . RAID 1+0 All the way! Re:Performanc... (~Sanjay Quettum... 1.May.03)
. . . . Not if you look at what he has to w... (~Dan Elhipister... 1.May.03)
. . . . . . re: Not if you look at what he has ... (~Sanjay Quettum... 2.May.03)
. . . . . . . . RE: re: Not if you look at what he ... (~Holly Ektumist... 5.May.03)
. . . . . . . . . . 3 drive RAID 5 - a waste re: Not if... (~Pippy Nimniobu... 5.May.03)
. . . . . . . . . . . . New server drive configs - any advi... (~Sigmund Prejip... 10.Jul.03)


Document Options






  Document options
Print this pagePrint this page

Search this forum

Forum views and search


  Forum views and search
Date (threaded)
Date (flat)
With excerpt
Category
Platform
Release
Advanced search

Member Tools


RSS Feeds

 RSS feedsRSS
All forum posts RSS
All main topics RSS